Key result
Combined pharmacological and physical modalities reduced VTE incidence by a mean of 69% (range 16-100%) compared to single modalities alone.
Why the study?
Do combined pharmacological and physical modalities reduce VTE incidence compared to single modalities in patients at risk of VTE?
Do combined pharmacological and physical modalities reduce VTE incidence compared to single modalities in patients at risk of VTE?
Effect estimate: Mean reduction 69%
Combined pharmacological and physical modalities are more effective than single modalities for VTE prophylaxis, supporting current consensus recommendations for high-risk patients.
May support combined VTE prophylaxis in high-risk patients; leaves open prospective randomized confirmation.
Objective Despite recent advances in the field of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis and adherence to guideline recommendations, VTE remains a serious problem, especially in high-risk groups. The aim of the present review was to summarize the evidence supporting the use of combined modalities, both physical and pharmacological, in VTE prevention. Methods Using Medline, original studies on the value of combined modalities in VTE prevention were identified. Keywords used for physical methods included elastic stockings and intermittent pneumatic compression, and for pharmacological methods included unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin. Relevant articles from their bibliography were also retrieved. Results Combined pharmacological and physical modalities were more effective than each modality alone in a variety of specialties, including orthopaedic, general and cardiac surgery, as shown by 14 of the 18 randomized or case-control studies retrieved. Mean reduction in VTE incidence was 69% (range 16–100%). Conclusion Combined modalities are more effective than single modalities in VTE prophylaxis. These results endorse their use, especially in high-risk patients, and support this otherwise typical recommendation of the consensus documents on VTE prophylaxis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kakkos et al. (2006) conducted a review in Venous thromboembolism. Combined physical and pharmacological modalities vs. Single modalities alone was evaluated on VTE incidence (Mean reduction 69%). Combined pharmacological and physical modalities reduced VTE incidence by a mean of 69% (range 16-100%) compared to single modalities alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: