Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective : To evaluate the effects of different sandblasting procedures on the wear and surface properties of zirconia and resin-based CAD/CAM restorative materials and to evaluate the relationships among materials and procedures. Materials and Methods : A total of 160 specimens of 2 mm thickness were prepared from Cerasmart, Vita-Enamic, Tetric-CAD, and Katana-Zirconia CAD/CAM materials. Each material was divided into four groups. Group-1: Control; Group-2: 29 μ m Al 2 O 3 ; Group-3: 30 μ m CoJet; and Group-4: 50 μ m Al 2 O 3 . Sandblasting procedures were applied from a distance of 10 mm for 15 s at 2 bar pressure. The volume loss resulting from sandblasting was calculated. The samples were then scanned with a Nanovea-PS50 non-contact profilometer. The Ra, Rz, and Sa values were recorded. The data were analyzed with the Shapiro-Wilk test and two-way ANOVA. Results : Group-4 showed the highest Ra and Rz values in all materials. The highest Sa and volume differences values were observed for Cerasmart, Vita-Enamic, and Tetric-CAD in Group-4; similar values were obtained for Katana-Zirconia. When the materials were compared, Cerasmart exhibited the highest volume differences, Ra, Rz, and Sa values in Group-4, while Katana-Zirconia demonstrated the lowest. Conclusions : Sandblasting procedure and material type showed a significant impact on the wear and surface properties. The abrasive effect increased with the increasing Al 2 O 3 particle sizes for resin-matrix materials. Sandblasting with 50 μ m Al 2 O 3 exhibited the lowest wear and surface roughness values for Katana-Zirconia and the highest for Cerasmart.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ALPER et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: