Key result
Adherence to the ABC pathway in clinically complex patients with atrial fibrillation reduced the risk of all-cause death by 28% (aHR 0.72) compared to non-adherence.
Why the study?
Clinical complexity is increasingly prevalent in AF, but limited data exist regarding the usefulness of the Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway in clinically complex patients.
Does adherence to the ABC pathway reduce the risk of major adverse events in clinically complex patients with atrial fibrillation?
Population
8289 clinically complex AF patients from 9966 total patients in the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF registry
Comparison
Adherence to the ABC pathway vs non-adherence
Design
Registry-based cohort study
Authors
Loading...
ABC adherence was associated with fewer deaths and MACEs in complex AF; leaves open whether implementation improves outcomes pending trials.
Observational (n=9,966)
Yes
Does adherence to the ABC pathway reduce the risk of major adverse events in clinically complex patients with atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 0.72 (95% CI 0.58–0.91)
Number Needed to Treat: 24
Adherence to the holistic ABC pathway significantly improves survival and reduces cardiovascular events in clinically complex patients with atrial fibrillation.
Romiti et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=9,966). Adherence to the Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway vs. Non-adherence to the ABC pathway was evaluated on All-cause death (aHR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.91). Adherence to the ABC pathway in clinically complex patients with atrial fibrillation reduced the risk of all-cause death by 28% (aHR 0.72) compared to non-adherence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: