Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We found using ATR-IR spectroscopy that 4,4‘-diprotonated bipyridine (BiPyH 2 2+ ) adsorbs at the second layer outside sulfate ions on Au(111) surface above ca. 0.0 V (vs Ag/AgCl) at pH < 2.65. In contrast, surface coverage of BiPyH 2 2+ increases from −0.3 V to −0.1 V at pH ≈ 2.65 close to p K a 1 (dissociation constant for the protonated forms) of BiPyH 2 2+, while BiPy coverage increases to +1.10 V as in neutral Na 2 SO 4 solution (pH = 7.1). The same BiPyH 2 2+ adspecies were observed in 0.1 M HClO 4 solution. Noteworthy is that BiPyH 2 2+ adsorbs at the first layer and ClO 4 - at the second layer in this case. Furthermore, the surface coverage of these species does not decrease with increasing the potential after the saturation at ca. +0.3 V. In contrast, the surface coverage of BiPyH 2 2+ and ClO 4 - increases up to ca. +0.8 V in Cl - -containing solution, because chemisorbed Cl - ions at the first layer stabilizes the BiPyH 2 2+ and ClO 4 - adsorption at the second and third layer, respectively. Moreover, the adsorption of BiPyH 2 2+ is suppressed in Br - - or I - -containing solution due to discharge of these ions at the Au(111) surface. Pyridine and 2,2‘-BiPy molecules in contrast to 4,4‘-BiPy adsorb after a deprotonation even in a strong acidic solution with pH < p K a . Thus, the quite unique adsorbed state of 4,4‘-BiPy is attributed to the molecular structure in which the solution side is strongly hydrophilic for an end-on adsorption to the Au gold electrode.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masayuki Futamata (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: