Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of sharps injury reporting amongst surgeons. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 164 surgeons completed a questionnaire on the reporting of sharps injuries, on the reasons for not reporting and their practise of universal precautions. RESULTS: Out of 164 surgeons, only 25.8% had reported all their injuries, 22.5% had reported some and 51.7% had reported none. The top three reasons for not reporting their injuries included perception of low risk of transmission, not being concerned and no time. Of the respondents, 15.9% practised all three universal precautions of double-gloving, face shields and hands-free technique. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that despite local trust adherence to Department of Health policy, sharps injury reporting rates are inadequate. Further investment into healthcare worker education as well as a facilitation of the process of reporting may be necessary to improve reporting rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerr et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: