Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The synthesis of potential "combined prodrugs" wherein phosphonoformate or phosphonoacetate was attached to the 5'-position of 2'-deoxyuridine, 2'-deoxythymidine, 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine (IDU), 5-(2-chloroethyl)-2'-deoxyuridine (CEDU), or 5-(2-bromovinyl)-2'-deoxyuridine (BVDU) or to the 3'-position of CEDU is described. The antiviral activities of these derivatives and of reference compounds were compared in Vero, HEp-2, and primary rabbit kidney cells against herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and -2). The CEDU and BVDU analogues were also evaluated against systemic and intracutaneous HSV-1 infection in mice. The nature of the 5-substituent proved critical for antiviral activity, since only the 5-iodo-, 5-(2-bromovinyl)-, and 5-(2-chloroethyl)-substituted derivatives were inhibitory to the herpesviruses. Furthermore, the type specificity is determined by the nature of the 5-substituent: the IDU analogues were similarly inhibitory to HSV-1 and -2 whereas the CEDU and BVDU analogues inhibited HSV-2 replication only at considerably higher concentrations than HSV-1. In vivo, several derivatives were shown to possess significant antiviral activity; however, none surpassed its respective parent compound, CEDU or BVDU, in potency. It seems improbable, therefore, that a synergistic effect between PFA or PAA and the nucleoside analogue occurred. The extent of in vitro and in vivo activity of the CEDU and BVDU 5'-phosphonoformates and 5'-phosphonoacetates is most plausibly explained by the ease by which the "combined prodrugs" are hydrolyzed and the parent compound, CEDU and BVDU, respectively, is released.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Griengl et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: