Key result
Alogliptin did not significantly affect the total number of cardiovascular events compared with placebo (873 vs 893 events; P=0.52) in patients with type 2 diabetes and recent acute coronary syndrome.
Why the study?
Does alogliptin affect recurrent and total CV events compared to placebo in patients with T2DM and recent acute coronary syndrome?
RCT (n=5,380)
Does alogliptin affect recurrent and total CV events compared to placebo in patients with T2DM and recent acute coronary syndrome?
Alogliptin does not increase the risk of first or recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM and recent acute coronary syndrome, supporting its cardiovascular safety.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports alogliptin CV safety in T2DM post-ACS; confirms neutral effect on total events in this RCT.
Alogliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). EXAMINE was a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to demonstrate the cardiovascular (CV) safety of alogliptin. In the trial, 5380 patients with established T2DM who had a recent acute coronary syndrome event (between 15 and 90 days) were randomized to treatment with either alogliptin or placebo. To better understand and describe the CV safety of alogliptin, we analyzed data from the EXAMINE trial to determine whether treatment with alogliptin affected recurrent and total CV events. Poisson regression analysis compared the total number of occurrences of CV death, MI, stroke, unstable angina, and coronary revascularization between all patients randomized to alogliptin vs placebo groups. Patients with recurrent CV events were older and more likely to have renal disease and history of heart failure. There were 1100 first CV events and an additional 666 recurrent events over a median of 18 months of follow-up. There were no significant differences with regard to total number of events in patients treated with alogliptin (n = 873) or placebo (n = 893; P = 0.52). Furthermore, there were no differences in the types of events seen in patients treated with alogliptin or placebo. Alogliptin did not increase the risk of either first or recurrent CV events when compared with placebo in patients with T2DM and recent acute coronary syndrome. These data support the CV safety of alogliptin in patients who are at increased risk of future CV events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cavender et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes and recent acute coronary syndrome (n=5,380). Alogliptin vs. Placebo was evaluated on Total number of occurrences of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina, and coronary revascularization (p=0.52). Alogliptin did not significantly affect the total number of cardiovascular events compared with placebo (873 vs 893 events; P=0.52) in patients with type 2 diabetes and recent acute coronary syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: