Why the study?
Does home telemonitoring with an intervention algorithm prompt clinical interventions in primary care patients with chronic diseases?
Does home telemonitoring with an intervention algorithm prompt clinical interventions in primary care patients with chronic diseases?
A 12-week home telemonitoring program with an intervention algorithm successfully identified the need for clinical intervention in 38% of primary care patients with chronic diseases.
May prompt early interventions in chronic disease telemonitoring; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
We have investigated the use of telemonitoring in three long-term conditions: chronic heart failure (CHF), type 2 diabetes and essential hypertension. Participants were provided with a home telemonitoring unit for a 12-week period and entered physiological data each day. The data were sent automatically via the participant's telephone line to a server and could be viewed via a web browser. An intervention algorithm was developed to improve the accuracy with which patients requiring intervention were recognized compared to existing systems based on a simple threshold. Thirty patients completed the 12-week trial. One patient dropped out, giving data on 29 patients (mean age 70 years, 17 women). The algorithm prompted a clinical intervention in 11 patients (38%). The average time that elapsed before the first intervention was 47 days (SD 21). Primarily the interventions (72%) resulted in changes to medication and health advice. The results suggest that four weeks is sufficient time in which to recognize the need to intervene clinically and that in 12 weeks it is possible to effect a change towards a target.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fursse et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: