Key result
Coronary intervention in 38 patients with previous MI and preserved viability restored coronary flow reserve to values similar to those in 48 patients with angina pectoris.
Why the study?
Is coronary flow reserve after coronary intervention similar in patients with previous myocardial infarction and preserved viability compared to those with angina pectoris?
Observational (n=86)
Is coronary flow reserve after coronary intervention similar in patients with previous myocardial infarction and preserved viability compared to those with angina pectoris?
Coronary intervention restores coronary flow reserve in patients with previous MI and preserved viability to levels comparable to those seen in patients with angina pectoris.
May support viability-guided intervention post-MI; leaves open whether CFR normalization improves outcomes in randomized trials.
The relationship between coronary flow reserve (CFR) and viability in the infarcted myocardium has not been fully clarified. We measured coronary blood flow velocity immediately after coronary intervention (with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA] or stenting) in 38 patients with previous myocardial infarction and preserved viability and 48 with angina pectoris. CFR was calculated and was similar between the two patient groups. No differences in the incidence of post-intervention CFR > 2.0 were detected; there were no differences in post-intervention CFR between patients with preserved myocardial viability and those with angina pectoris who underwent PTCA. Coronary stenting reduced the percentage diameter stenosis in both groups compared with PTCA and slightly increased the post-intervention CFR. No differences were, however, detected in post-intervention CFR between patients with preserved myocardial viability and those with angina pectoris who underwent additional stenting. These results reveal that in patients with preserved myocardial viability, post-intervention CFR was restored to values similar to those in patients with angina pectoris.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takaishi et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Previous myocardial infarction with preserved viability or angina pectoris (n=86). Previous myocardial infarction with preserved viability vs. Angina pectoris was evaluated on Coronary flow reserve (CFR) immediately after coronary intervention. Coronary intervention in 38 patients with previous MI and preserved viability restored coronary flow reserve to values similar to those in 48 patients with angina pectoris.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: