Key result
Patients with abnormal coronary flow reserve (CFR < 2.0) after stenting had significantly higher post-PTCA area stenosis compared to those with CFR ≥ 2.0 (58.7% vs 45.3%, P < 0.05).
Why the study?
What are the clinical characteristics and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) findings associated with abnormal coronary flow reserve (CFR < 2.0) after stenting?
Observational (n=118)
What are the clinical characteristics and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) findings associated with abnormal coronary flow reserve (CFR < 2.0) after stenting?
Absolute Event Rate: 58.7% vs 45.3%
p-value: p=< 0.05
Patients with diffuse calcified lesions or high post-PTCA area stenosis on IVUS are more likely to have an abnormal coronary flow reserve (< 2.0) after stenting.
Greater post-PTCA area stenosis was associated with impaired CFR after stenting; leaves open whether IVUS optimization improves flow reserve.
A coronary flow reserve (CFR) of 2.0 has been advocated as the endpoint for coronary intervention therapy. Experience shows, however, that CFR does indeed exceed 2.0 in many cases poststenting, while remaining below 2.0 in others. In this study, we assessed the clinical characteristics and IVUS findings of patients whose CFR remained below 2.0 after stent implantation, specifically 16 patients with CFR below 2.0 (22 lesions, 64 +/- 9 years, 4 female), and 102 patients with CFR above 2.0 (112 lesions, mean age 66 +/- 11 years, 22 female). Patient population comprised patients selected for retrospective study, but participants were selected on the basis of matching patient and lesion characteristics. The IVUS findings showed that incidence of calcified lesions and post-PTCA dissection of hard plaque were higher among patients with CFR < 2.0. Further, IVUS-obtained vascular measurements showed post-PTCA area stenosis to be 58.7 +/- 15.2% in the CFR < 2.0 group, and 45.3 +/- 12.5% among CFR > or = 2.0 patients (P < 0.05). These findings indicate that patients with diffuse calcified lesions or high post-PTCA % area stenosis, as determined by IVUS, are more likely to have lower CFR after stenting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muramatsu et al. (2001) conducted an observational in abnormal coronary flow reserve after stenting (n=118). CFR < 2.0 vs. CFR ≥ 2.0 was evaluated on post-PTCA area stenosis (p=< 0.05). Patients with abnormal coronary flow reserve (CFR < 2.0) after stenting had significantly higher post-PTCA area stenosis compared to those with CFR ≥ 2.0 (58.7% vs 45.3%, P < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: