Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: Treatment of Underlying Forms (TUF) is a training program grounded in linguistic theory and aiming to boost complex sentences production in people with agrammatism. Language treatment studies in aphasia confirmed TUF efficacy and led to the formulation of the Complexity Account of Treatment Efficacy (CATE). According to CATE, which relies on the primitive distinction between A- and A'-structures, training complex sentences induces an improvement on simpler structures, but no generalization occurs between different types of syntactic movement. This experiment provides the first adaptation of TUF in Italian and investigates the cross-linguistic validity of training efficacy and its generalization pattern. METHOD: Using a single-subject experimental design, five participants with chronic poststroke agrammatism underwent intensive training for object relatives. Performance on trained and untrained object relatives (A'-structures), object clefts (simpler A'-structures), and passive sentences (A-structures) was measured at multiple time points, that is, pre- and posttreatment, during the training, and at follow-up. A standardized assessment of aphasia was also administered pre- and posttreatment. RESULTS: The results reported a robust improvement in the production of trained and untrained object relatives in all five participants, a generalization to object clefts in four participants, and, unexpectedly, a generalization to passives in three participants. All participants showed improved comprehension on all these structures. A general linguistic improvement was also found in the standardized testing of aphasia, especially in morphosyntactic abilities. CONCLUSIONS: as a primitive (keeping the A vs. A' distinction as a modulating factor).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Viganò et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: