Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Following the approval of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) monotherapy for the treatment of adults with relapsed/refractory CD22-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a post-marketing requirement study due to their concerns that the proposed dose of 1.8 mg/m2/cycle may not be optimal in balancing the safety and efficacy of InO. Here, we provide an overview of single-agent InO dose-optimization strategies, including the rationale for studying a fractionated InO dosing schedule and justification for the approved dosing regimen based on clinical safety and efficacy data, as well as comprehensive exposure–response analyses from InO clinical studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DeAngelo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: