Key result
Anakinra treatment for 14 days in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and right ventricular failure did not significantly improve the co-primary endpoints of peak oxygen consumption (change -0.8 mL/kg/min) or VE/VCO2 slope.
Why the study?
Is anakinra safe and feasible as an add-on therapy in patients with stable pulmonary arterial hypertension and right ventricular failure?
Is anakinra safe and feasible as an add-on therapy in patients with stable pulmonary arterial hypertension and right ventricular failure?
Mean Difference: -0.8 (95% CI -3.2–3.3)
p-value: p=0.500
Anakinra shows no exercise benefit in PAH with RV failure; leaves open its safety and role as add-on therapy for randomized trials.
Over time, patients with longstanding pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) experience pressure overload in the right ventricle (RV), leading to reduced contractile force and chamber dilation.Present strategies to treat PAH consist of pulmonary arterial vasodilators by way of the prostacyclin, endothelin, or nitric oxide pathways.It is now appreciated that maladaptive inflammatory signaling is a key contributor to the development of obliterative pulmonary arteriolar lesions and RV failure in PAH (1, 2), and that IL-1 and IL-6 levels correlate with the degree of RV failure (3).With experimental animal data suggesting anakinra (recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist) protects against development of PAH (4), we designed a single-group, open-label phase IB/II pilot study (clinicaltrials.govidentifier: NCT03057028) to evaluate the feasibility and safety of treatment with anakinra as add-on therapy to standard of care in patients with stable PAH and RV failure.In addition to the preclinical data, anakinra was chosen on the basis of multiple favorable clinical trials in left-sided systolic dysfunction by our group (5, 6).Here we report the findings from our pilot study.From October 2017 to May 2018, patients at the Virginia Commonwealth University treated for pulmonary hypertension were screened for eligibility.Inclusion criteria included group 1 PAH ( 7) (not associated with connective tissue disease, human immunodeficiency virus, portal hypertension, or schistosomiasis), age .18years, and symptomatic RV failure (objective findings of RV dysfunction by echocardiography [RV diastolic diameter .4.3 cm, fractional area change ,35%, or tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion <1.5 cm] with New York Heart Association class II or III heart failure symptoms) despite optimal PAH therapy.Exclusion criteria included autoimmune/autoinflammatory diseases, anti-inflammatory medications, recent malignancy or infection, and severe renal dysfunction.Of the 39 patients who met inclusion criteria, 10 were excluded (chronic inflammatory disorders [n = 4], infection [n = 1], severe renal dysfunction [n = 2], non-English speaking [n = 1], unable to consent [n = 1], pregnant [n = 1]). Sixteen patients were approached for the study: 6 declined to participate, and 10 agreed to enroll, which was the sample size chosen to gather preliminary data.However, scheduling conflicts prevented two patients from completing
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trankle et al. (2018) conducted a letter in Pulmonary arterial hypertension and right ventricular failure (n=7). Anakinra was evaluated on Change in peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2) (MD -0.8 mL/kg/min, 95% CI -3.2 to 3.3, p=0.500). Anakinra treatment for 14 days in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and right ventricular failure did not significantly improve the co-primary endpoints of peak oxygen consumption (change -0.8 mL/kg/min) or VE/VCO2 slope.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: