Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two experiments were conducted to examine the effects of nutrition information on hedonic ratings of nutrient-modified foods. In Experiment I, 100 college-age students used nine-point hedonic scales to indicate how much they liked a commercially available reduced-fat chocolate chip muffin. Fifty students were told that the muffin was reduced-fat, and 50 were not told. Mean hedonic scores were significantly (p < 0.05) lower for those who received the information, indicating that the muffin was less acceptable to these students. Most students were consumers of reduced-fat foods and reported consuming reduced-fat foods either “once in awhile” or “regularly.” Experiment II was conducted in the same manner as Experiment I; 100 students rated a commercially available calcium-fortified orange juice. Nutrition information had no significant effect (p > 0.05) on hedonic ratings. For both experiments, students were readers of food labels; the majority reported reading labels either “frequently” or “sometimes” when buying food products in a grocery store. Differences in results for the two experiments might be attributed to students' expectations of and experiences with reduced-fat foods as well as students' knowledge of the importance of fat and calcium in the diet.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brochetti et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 9 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: