Key result
Inspiratory resistive loading at 80% of maximal inspiratory pressure lowered parasympathetic heart rate variability indices compared to 30%.
Why the study?
Do different inspiratory resistive loading intensities influence autonomic heart rate modulation in healthy elderly men?
RCT (n=25)
double-blind
randomized
Do different inspiratory resistive loading intensities influence autonomic heart rate modulation in healthy elderly men?
Lower inspiratory resistive loading intensities (30% MIP) promote better parasympathetic sinus node modulation compared to higher intensities (80% MIP) in healthy elderly men.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High-intensity inspiratory loading may blunt parasympathetic modulation in elderly men; extends RCT evidence on intensity-dependent autonomic effects.
BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular system is noticeably affected by respiration. However, whether different inspiratory resistive loading intensities can influence autonomic heart rate (HR) modulation remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to investigate HR modulation at three different inspiratory resistive loading intensities in healthy elderly men. METHOD: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study that evaluated 25 healthy elderly men. Cardiac autonomic modulation was assessed using heart rate variability (HRV) indices. All of the volunteers underwent maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) measurements according to standardized pulmonary function measurements. Three randomly-applied inspiratory resistive loading (30, 60 and 80% of MIP) intensities were then applied using an inspiratory resistance device (POWERbreathe, Southam, UK), during which the volunteers were asked to inhale for 2 seconds and exhale for 3 seconds and complete 12 breaths per minute. Each effort level was performed for 4 minutes, and HR and the distance between 2 subsequent R waves of electrocardiogram (R-R intervals) were collected at rest and at each intensity for further HRV analysis. RESULTS: The parasympathetic HRV (rMSSD, SD1 and HF) indices demonstrated lower values at 80% (rMSSD: 19±2 ms, SD1: 13±2 ms and HF: 228±61 ms2) than at 30% MIP (rMSSD: 25±3 ms, SD1: 18±2 ms and HF: 447±95 ms2; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Lower inspiratory resistive loading intensities promoted a marked and positive improvement of parasympathetic sinus node modulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Archiza et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in healthy elderly men (n=25). Inspiratory resistive loading vs. 30% of MIP was evaluated on Parasympathetic HRV index (rMSSD) in ms (p=<0.05). Inspiratory resistive loading at 80% of maximal inspiratory pressure lowered parasympathetic heart rate variability indices compared to 30%.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: