Key result
Last recorded ED heart rate for age had poor discrimination for predicting ED revisit with admission within 72 hours (AUC 0.61; 95% CI 0.58-0.63).
Why the study?
Does last recorded ED heart rate predict ED revisit with admission within 72 hours in pediatric emergency patients?
Cohort (n=183,433)
No
Does last recorded ED heart rate predict ED revisit with admission within 72 hours in pediatric emergency patients?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.61 (95% CI 0.58-0.63)
Last recorded ED heart rate discriminates poorly for predicting revisit with admission in pediatric patients and should not be used in isolation as a trigger for mandatory reevaluation prior to discharge.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify emergency department (ED) heart rate (HR) values that identify children at elevated risk of ED revisit with admission. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients 0 to 18 years old discharged from a tertiary-care pediatric ED from January 2013 to December 2014. We created percentile curves for the last recorded HR for age using data from calendar year 2013 and used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to characterize the performance of the percentiles for predicting ED revisit with admission within 72 hours. In a held-out validation data set (calendar year 2014 data), we evaluated test characteristics of last-recorded HR-for-age cut points identified as promising on the ROC curves, as well as those identifying the highest 5% and 1% of last recorded HRs for age. RESULTS: We evaluated 183,433 eligible ED visits. Last recorded HR for age had poor discrimination for predicting revisit with admission (area under the curve, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.63). No promising cut points were identified on the ROC curves. Cut points identifying the highest 5% and 1% of last recorded HRs for age showed low sensitivity (10.1% and 2.5%) with numbers needed to evaluate of 62 and 50, respectively, to potentially prevent 1 revisit with admission. CONCLUSIONS: Last recorded ED HR discriminates poorly between children who are and are not at risk of revisit with admission in a pediatric ED. The use of single-parameter HR in isolation as an automated trigger for mandatory reevaluation prior to discharge may not improve revisit outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daymont et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Pediatric emergency patients at risk of ED revisit with admission (n=183,433). Last recorded heart rate for age was evaluated on ED revisit with admission within 72 hours (AUC 0.61, 95% CI 0.58-0.63). Last recorded ED heart rate for age had poor discrimination for predicting ED revisit with admission within 72 hours (AUC 0.61; 95% CI 0.58-0.63).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: