Key result
Surgery performed by a non-colorectal team significantly increased the odds of a suboptimal length of stay (>4 days) compared to a colorectal team (OR 4.09) in patients undergoing elective segmental colectomy.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to identify whether compliance with ERAS Society recommendations is associated with length of stay for patients undergoing segmental colectomy in mixed acute and elective general surgery wards.
Does compliance with ERAS guidelines and surgical team expertise reduce suboptimal length of stay in patients undergoing elective segmental colectomy?
Cohort (n=376)
No
Does compliance with ERAS guidelines and surgical team expertise reduce suboptimal length of stay in patients undergoing elective segmental colectomy?
Non-compliance with ERAS guidelines for laparoscopic approach and early removal of indwelling catheters, particularly by non-colorectal teams, is associated with suboptimal length of stay following segmental colectomy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support colorectal team involvement for colectomy; leaves open whether ERAS adherence mediates length-of-stay effects.
BACKGROUND: To identify whether compliance with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations is associated with length of stay (LOS) in a New Zealand hospital for patients undergoing segmental colectomy in mixed acute and elective general surgery wards. METHODS: Consecutive elective colorectal surgeries (n = 770) between October 2012 and February 2019 were audited. Patients with non-segmental colectomies, multi-organ surgeries, LOS > 14 days, and those who died were excluded. Logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between patient demographics, compliance with ERAS guidelines, and suboptimal LOS (> 4 days). RESULTS: Analysis included 376 patients. Age, surgery prior to 2014, surgical approach, non-colorectal surgical team, operation type, and complications were significantly associated with suboptimal LOS. Non-compliance with ERAS recommendations for laparoscopy [OR 8.9, 95% CI (4.52, 19.67)], removal of indwelling catheters (IDC) [OR 3.14, 95% CI (1.85, 5.51)], use of abdominal drains [OR 4.27, 95% CI (0.99, 18.35)], and removal of PCA [OR 8.71, 95% CI (1.78, 157.27)], were associated with suboptimal LOS (univariable analysis). Multivariable analysis showed that age, surgical team, late removal of IDC, and open approach were independent predictors of suboptimal LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Non-compliance with ERAS guidelines for laparoscopic approach and early removal of IDC was higher among procedures performed by non-colorectal surgery teams, and was also associated with adverse postoperative events and suboptimal LOS. This study demonstrates the importance of the surgical team's expertise in affecting surgical outcomes, and did not find significant independent associations between most individual ERAS guidelines and suboptimal LOS once adjusting for other factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mallard et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Elective segmental colectomy (n=376). Non-colorectal surgical team vs. Colorectal surgical team was evaluated on Suboptimal length of stay (> 4 days) (OR 4.09, 95% CI 1.85-9.05, p=<0.001). Surgery performed by a non-colorectal team significantly increased the odds of a suboptimal length of stay (>4 days) compared to a colorectal team (OR 4.09) in patients undergoing elective segmental colectomy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: