Key result
Open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair resulted in similar late survival compared to endovascular repair, with 5-year survival rates of 79% vs 75% and 15-year rates of 31% vs 33% (P=0.75).
Why the study?
Does open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair compared to endovascular repair improve long-term survival in patients undergoing elective repair?
Cohort (n=1,340)
No
Does open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair compared to endovascular repair improve long-term survival in patients undergoing elective repair?
Absolute Event Rate: 79% vs 75%
p-value: p=0.75
There is no significant difference in late survival between open and endovascular repair for elective abdominal aortic aneurysms up to 15 years.
Supports similar long-term survival with either repair in elective AAA; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Abdominal aortic aneurysms can be either treated by an open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair or an endovascular repair. Comparing clinical predictors of outcomes and those which influence survival rates in the long term is important in determining the choice of treatment offered and the decision-making process with patients. AIMS: To determine the influence of pre-existing clinical predictors and perioperative determinants on late survival of elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and endovascular repair at a tertiary hospital. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair from 1990 to 2013 were included. Data were collected from a prospectively acquired database and death data were gathered from the Queensland state death registry. Pre-existing risks and perioperative factors were assessed independently. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression modeling were performed. RESULTS: During the study period, 1340 abdominal aortic aneurysms were repaired electively, of which 982 were open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The average age was 72.4 years old and 81.7% were males. The cumulative percentage survival rates for open abdominal aortic aneurysms repair at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years were 79, 49, 31 and 22, respectively. The corresponding 5-, 10- and 15-year survival rates for endovascular repair were not significantly different at 75, 49 and 33%, respectively (P = 0.75). Predictors of reduced survival were advanced age, American Society of Anaesthesiology scores, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal impairment, bifurcated grafts, peripheral vascular disease and congestive heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: Open repair offers a good long-term treatment option for patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm and in our experience there is no significant difference in late survival between open abdominal aortic aneurysms repair and endovascular repair. Consideration of the factors identified in this study that predict reduced long-term survival for open abdominal aortic aneurysms repair and endovascular repair should be considered when deciding repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khashram et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=1,340). Open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair vs. Endovascular repair was evaluated on 5-year survival (p=0.75). Open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair resulted in similar late survival compared to endovascular repair, with 5-year survival rates of 79% vs 75% and 15-year rates of 31% vs 33% (P=0.75).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: