Key result
Non-contact infrared thermography combined with a random forest machine learning model estimated pediatric heart rate with a root mean squared error of 24.54 and a mean absolute percentage error of 16.129.
Why the study?
Thermal videos for capturing heart rate have been underexplored, and machine learning approaches to estimate heart rate from continuous thermal videos are currently lacking.
Does non-contact infrared thermography combined with machine learning accurately estimate heart rate in pediatric ICU patients?
Observational (n=65)
No
Does non-contact infrared thermography combined with machine learning accurately estimate heart rate in pediatric ICU patients?
Effect estimate: RMSE 24.54, MAPE 16.129
Non-contact infrared thermography combined with machine learning demonstrates feasibility for continuous, non-invasive heart rate monitoring in pediatric ICU patients.
Supports feasibility of non-contact HR monitoring in pediatric ICU; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before any clinical use.
Heart rate is one of the vital signs for monitoring health. Non-invasive, non-contact assessment of heart rate can lead to safe and potentially telemedicine based monitoring. Thermal videos as a modality for capturing heart rate has been underexplored. Regions with large vessels such as the face can capture the pulsatile change in temperature associated with the blood flow. The use of a machine learning-based approach to capture heart rate from continuous thermal videos is currently lacking. Our present clinical investigation comprises the continuous monitoring of heart rate from a smaller number of samples by using a combination of an efficient deep-learning-based segmentation followed by domain-knowledge-based feature calculation for estimating heart rate from 124 thermal imaging videos comprising 3,628,087 frames of 65 patients, admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit at AIIMS, New Delhi. We hypothesized that periodic fluctuations of thermal intensity over the face can capture heart rate. Frequency domain features for thermal time series were extracted followed by supervised learning using a battery of models. A random forest model yielded the best results with a root mean squared error of 24.54 and mean absolute percentage error of 16.129. Clinical profiling of the model showed a wide range of clinical conditions in the admitted children with acceptable model performance. Affordable and commercially available thermal cameras establish the feasibility and cost viability of exploring deployments for patient heart rate estimation in non-invasive and non-contact environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaur et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Pediatric intensive care unit patients (n=65). Non-contact infrared thermography with machine learning vs. Standard vital sign monitoring (actual heart rate) was evaluated on Heart rate estimation accuracy (RMSE and MAPE) (RMSE 24.54, MAPE 16.129). Non-contact infrared thermography combined with a random forest machine learning model estimated pediatric heart rate with a root mean squared error of 24.54 and a mean absolute percentage error of 16.129.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: