Key result
A novel non-contact method of heart rate measurement using infrared sequence images achieved a mean accuracy rate of 94.5% compared with concomitant ECG.
Why the study?
Does a non-contact infrared sequence image method accurately measure heart rate compared to ECG in healthy subjects?
Does a non-contact infrared sequence image method accurately measure heart rate compared to ECG in healthy subjects?
A novel non-contact heart rate measurement method using infrared sequence images achieved 94.5% accuracy compared to ECG in a small cohort of healthy subjects.
Heart rate is an important indicator for the mental and physical state, but it is usually measured through physical contact. In this paper, a novel non-contact method of heart rate measurement has been proposed from the infrared sequence images. First, a square region of interest (ROI) was manually selected to cover the temple on the first frame. Then a head movement detection algorithm based on the centroid coordinate change of the extracted skin area was applied to the infrared sequence images, and according to the movement result, the ROI location in subsequent frames could be identified. After that, the distance between the gravity center and the top-left corner in every ROI is computed to get a time-lapse signal. Finally, the discrete wavelet transform and an autoregressive model were used respectively to recognize the heart rate. Fourteen healthy subjects (24-29 years of age, 4 females and 10 males) participated in the experiment. Compared with the concomitant ECG, mean accuracy rate of 94.5% was acquired. The results show the potential of our method for non-contact heart rate measurement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jing et al. (2013) studied Healthy (n=14). Non-contact method of heart rate measurement from infrared sequence images vs. Concomitant ECG was evaluated on Mean accuracy rate of heart rate measurement. A novel non-contact method of heart rate measurement using infrared sequence images achieved a mean accuracy rate of 94.5% compared with concomitant ECG.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: