Key result
Goal-directed administration of 6% hydroxyethyl starch significantly reduced minimum perioperative FIBTEM maximum clot firmness by 6 mm compared to lactated Ringer's solution in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy.
Why the study?
Colloids may impair hemostatic capacity, but whether this occurs during goal-directed administration remains unclear.
Does goal-directed fluid management with 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 impair perioperative hemostasis compared to lactated Ringer's solution in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy?
RCT (n=50)
Single-blind
Computer-generated random codes
No
Does goal-directed fluid management with 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 impair perioperative hemostasis compared to lactated Ringer's solution in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy?
Goal-directed administration of 6% hydroxyethyl starch during partial hepatectomy transiently impairs fibrin polymerization compared to lactated Ringer's solution, but does not increase clinical blood loss.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Goal-directed hydroxyethyl starch impairs fibrin polymerization during hepatectomy; extends RCT evidence on transient hemostatic effects without increased blood loss.
The use of colloids may impair hemostatic capacity. However, it remains unclear whether this also holds true when colloids are administered in a goal-directed manner. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of goal-directed fluid management with 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 on hemostasis compared to lactated Ringer’s solution in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy. We included 50 patients in this prospective, randomized, controlled trial. According to randomization, patients received boluses of either hydroxyethyl starch or lactated Ringer’s solution within the scope of goal-directed fluid management. Minimum perioperative FIBTEM maximum clot firmness (MCF) served as the primary outcome parameter. Secondary outcome parameters included fibrinogen levels and estimated blood loss. In the hydroxyethyl starch (HES) group the minimum FIBTEM MCF value was significantly lower (effect size −6 mm, 95% CI −10 to −3, p < 0.001) in comparison to the lactated Ringer’s solution (RL) group. These results returned to normal within 24 h. We observed no difference in plasma fibrinogen levels (RL 3.08 ± 0.37 g L−1 vs HES 2.65 ± 0.64 g L−1, p = 0.18) or the amount of blood loss between the two groups (RL 470 ± 299 mL vs HES 604 ± 351 mL, p = 0.18). We showed that goal-directed use of HES impairs fibrin polymerization in a dose-dependent manner when compared with RL. Results returned to normal on the first postoperative day without administration of procoagulant drugs and no differences in blood loss were observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gratz et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Elective open partial hepatectomy (n=50). 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 vs. Lactated Ringer's solution was evaluated on Minimum perioperative FIBTEM maximum clot firmness (MCF) (MD -6 mm, 95% CI -10 to -3, p=<0.001). Goal-directed administration of 6% hydroxyethyl starch significantly reduced minimum perioperative FIBTEM maximum clot firmness by 6 mm compared to lactated Ringer's solution in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: