Key result
Polyester endografts resulted in more frequent fever and significantly higher serum IL-8 concentrations at 24 hours postoperatively compared to ePTFE endografts (p=0.01).
Why the study?
Does polyester endograft material compared to ePTFE affect the inflammatory response in men undergoing elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair?
Cohort (n=22)
Does polyester endograft material compared to ePTFE affect the inflammatory response in men undergoing elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair?
p-value: p=0.01
Polyester endografts may induce a slightly higher specific inflammatory response (fever and IL-8) compared to ePTFE endografts after elective EVAR, though overall biological responses are similar.
Should not alter endograft choice; leaves open the clinical significance of polyester-associated inflammation in EVAR.
The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of endograft material on the inflammatory response after elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Consecutive patients (n = 22, all men, 53 to 82 years old) were divided into 2 groups according to the graft material used: In group A (n = 12) the endovascular device was made of polyester and in group B (n = 10) the device was made of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE). All patients received antiinflammatory drugs in the perioperative period. Fever, white blood cells and platelet count, serum concentrations of cytokines (interleukin 6 [IL-6], tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-alpha], interleukin 8 [IL-8], acute-phase proteins high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP] and alpha1-antitrypsin [alpha1-antitrypsin]), and complement protein (C3a) were measured preoperatively and 1, 3, 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours after aneurysm exclusion. One patient in each group had a systemic inflammatory response syndrome with 2 of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. No other complication associated with inflammation were present in any patient. Fever was more frequent in group A patients. Increases of white blood cells and serum concentrations of IL-6, TNF-alpha, hsCRP, alpha1-antitrypsin, and C3a and decrease of platelet count were recorded in both groups, but no statistically significant difference between them was recorded. However, serum concentrations of IL-8 were significantly higher in group A patients 24 hours postoperatively (p = 0.01). No significant difference was apparent in the biological response between patients receiving a polyester or an ePTFE stent graft, except for fever and serum concentrations of IL-8.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerasimidis et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (n=22). Polyester endovascular device vs. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) endovascular device was evaluated on Inflammatory response (fever, white blood cells, platelets, cytokines, acute-phase proteins, complement protein) (p=0.01). Polyester endografts resulted in more frequent fever and significantly higher serum IL-8 concentrations at 24 hours postoperatively compared to ePTFE endografts (p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: