Key result
MICROFIT trial evaluates feasibility of a 24-week intensive lifestyle program for coronary microvascular dysfunction.
Why the study?
Coronary microvascular dysfunction carries poor cardiovascular outcomes and impairs quality of life, but evidence supporting cardiac rehabilitation is sparse despite guideline recommendations for lifestyle modification.
Does the MICROFIT intensive lifestyle rehabilitation program improve feasibility and angina symptoms in patients with symptomatic coronary microvascular dysfunction?
RCT (n=40)
Open-label with blinded outcome assessment
Block randomization (1:1)
Yes
Does the MICROFIT intensive lifestyle rehabilitation program improve feasibility and angina symptoms in patients with symptomatic coronary microvascular dysfunction?
The MICROFIT trial protocol outlines a feasibility study to evaluate a personalized, intensive lifestyle rehabilitation program incorporating HIIT and dietary counseling for patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction.
Background Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), a common endotype of angina with non-obstructed coronary arteries (ANOCA), is linked to poor cardiovascular outcomes, and can significantly impact quality of life, mental health, and functional capacity. CMD management strategies focus on symptom control with antianginal therapies, with limited effect and prognostic benefit. While lifestyle changes and risk factor modification are advocated by international guidelines, evidence supporting cardiac rehabilitation for CMD is sparse. It is proposed that MICROFIT—a personalized lifestyle intervention programme, utilizing exercise training and dietary counselling, underpinned by behavioural change techniques, can improve symptoms of angina in patients with CMD. This study aims to examine the feasibility of undertaking a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the MICROFIT programme vs. usual care in patients with CMD and explore its effects on symptoms of angina. Design and methods Forty participants (aged >18) will be recruited from two centers and randomized 1:1 to receive either MICROFIT intervention plus usual care or usual care only. The primary outcome is feasibility, measured by recruitment and retention, and adherence to the intervention. Participants' and practitioners' experience of the programme will be explored qualitatively. The secondary outcome is change in angina symptoms, to inform the design and power calculations for a future RCT. Other exploratory outcomes include changes to functional capacity (VO 2 peak ), cardiovascular MRI-derived markers of myocardial perfusion and coronary vascular function, and biomarkers of metabolic syndrome. A sub-study will explore experiences of the ANOCA diagnostic pathway from patient and healthcare professionals' perspective. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was granted by the NHS Health Research Authority Plymouth and Cornwall Research Ethics Committee (reference: 24/SW/0125, 30th October 2024). Study findings will be disseminated via presentations to relevant stakeholders, national and international conferences and open-access peer-reviewed research publications. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT06681896.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abramik et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) (n=40). MICROFIT intervention (High Intensity Interval Training, resistance training, and diet counseling) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Feasibility (recruitment rate, retention rate, adherence rate, and acceptability). The MICROFIT trial is a planned feasibility study designed to evaluate the recruitment, retention, adherence, and acceptability of a 24-week intensive lifestyle rehabilitation program in 40 patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: