Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Spike time dependent plasticity (STDP) is a learning rule in biology, where the time-correlation of narrow pre- and post-synaptic spikes (tspike≈5ms) is tracked across a wide learning window (LW) of time (tLW= ±80ms) by neurotransmitter dynamics at the synapse such that tLW:tspike> 20. In hardware, resistive random access memory (RRAM) (1M)-based synapse shows STDP by the superposition of long preand post-synaptic neural waveforms comparable to the timescale of the learning window. However, this artificially limits the spike rate and needs a complicated peripheral circuit to generate the waveform, which has an area penalty. In this letter, we propose a PrxCa1-xMnO3(PCMO)-based RRAM (1M) with an impact-ionization (II)based silicon (Si) NIPIN (n-iv-δ p-i-n) selector (1S) diode as a synapse to operate with only short spikes. The NIPIN device transient response is utilized as a clock at the synapse to compute a preand post-spike time correlation, such that the 1M1S synapse requires short pulses instead of long waveforms. We experimentally demonstrate that very short (tspike~ 80 ns) square pulses are required to generate STDP while the learning window is tLW≈ ± 1.5 μs, which enables tLW:tspike≈19. Furthermore, a hardware acceleration of 1000× over biology is shown. The square pulse scheme avoids complex waveforms and related complicated circuits. Thus, the synaptic time-keeping is demonstrated that enables biologically realistic SNN for future brain inspired computing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Das et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: