Key result
In HFrEF, diabetes with microvascular complications increased the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization compared to no diabetes (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.22-1.70).
Why the study?
Does the presence of microvascular complications worsen outcomes in HFrEF patients with diabetes compared to those without complications or without diabetes?
Cohort (n=2,707)
Does the presence of microvascular complications worsen outcomes in HFrEF patients with diabetes compared to those without complications or without diabetes?
In HFrEF patients, the presence of diabetes with microvascular complications is associated with significantly worse symptoms, quality of life, and clinical outcomes compared to diabetes without complications or no diabetes.
May warrant enhanced monitoring in HFrEF with diabetic microvascular complications; leaves open if these are modifiable targets.
AIMS: The role of microvascular complications in the risk conferred by diabetes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 2707 HFrEF patients in the Beta-blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial (BEST), stratified into three groups: no diabetes and diabetes without or with microvascular complications (neuropathy, nephropathy, or retinopathy). The risks of the composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization, and all-cause death, were studied using Cox regression analyses adjusted for other prognostic variables. Overall, 964 (36%) patients had diabetes, of which 313 (32%) had microvascular complications. Patients with microvascular complications had more severe symptoms (New York Heart Association class IV 12% vs. 9% diabetes with no complications and 7% no diabetes), and worse quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure median score 60 vs. 54 and 51 points). In patients with diabetes and complications, the rate of the composite outcome was 50 per 100 person-years of follow-up (compared with 34 and 29 in those with diabetes and no microvascular complications and participants without diabetes, respectively). Compared to patients without diabetes, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the composite outcome was 1.44 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22-1.70] and 1.18 (95% CI 1.03-1.35) for patients with diabetes with and without complications, respectively. The risk of all-cause mortality was similarly elevated: adjusted HR 1.42 (95% CI 1.16-1.74) and 1.20 (95% CI 1.01-1.42), respectively. CONCLUSION: In HFrEF, diabetes with microvascular complications is associated with worse symptoms and outcomes than diabetes without microvascular complications. Prevention of microvascular complications has the potential to improve HFrEF outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kristensen et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=2,707). Diabetes with microvascular complications vs. No diabetes was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.22-1.70). In HFrEF, diabetes with microvascular complications increased the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization compared to no diabetes (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.22-1.70).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: