Key result
Vaginal delivery is safe for pregnant women with adult congenital heart disease, whereas higher caesarean section rates are associated with an increased overall risk of adverse maternal outcomes.
Why the study?
Does vaginal delivery improve outcomes compared to caesarean section in pregnant patients with adult congenital heart disease?
Systematic Review (n=29,262)
Does vaginal delivery improve outcomes compared to caesarean section in pregnant patients with adult congenital heart disease?
Vaginal delivery is safe for pregnant patients with adult congenital heart disease across all NYHA classes, and routine caesarean section for cardiac indications does not improve outcomes.
Supports vaginal delivery preference in adult congenital heart disease pregnancies; challenges routine caesarean sections and extends safety evidence.
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: is vaginal delivery or caesarean section (CS) the safer mode of delivery in patients with adult congenital heart disease? Of the 119 studies, 13 papers represented the best evidence on the topic. Recommendations are based on 29 262 patients. Those having undergone successful corrective or palliative cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease, in addition to patients with unoperated congenital heart disease are a high-risk obstetric population. Heart disease is a leading cause of maternal mortality in the USA and the UK. Traditionally, CS was regarded as the mode of delivery of choice for high-risk patients, but growing experience in this field has now made this advice appear controversial. Patients are stratified into high- and low-risk, depending on the degree of heart failure symptoms [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class]. All studies demonstrated adverse outcomes in ACHD patients compared with normal age-matched controls. This pertained to a higher overall risk of maternal cardiac death, neonatal death, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction and longer hospital stay. On univariate regression analysis, the variables that imparted the highest risk to mother and foetus, were right ventricular failure, pulmonary regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension (P < 0.001). Induction of labour was deemed safe and was not associated with higher CS rates. There was no increase in maternal or neonatal complications in patients who were NYHA class I and II at labour. Patients who were NYHA class III and IV at labour had higher complication rates with adverse feto-maternal outcomes (P < 0.0001) and longer intensive care unit and hospital stay (Spearman's correlation 0.326, P = 0.007). The largest cohort from the USA (26 973 ACHD births) demonstrated that ventricular septal defect was associated with the highest risk of maternal death and complications (P < 0.05). The data would indicate that patients NYHA class I and II symptoms are suitable for VD. For most NYHA III and IV patients a trail of labour is safe with expedited delivery under good analgesic control as dictated by obstetric needs. Due to high complication risks, CS may be indicated in a proportion of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asfour et al. (2013) conducted a systematic review in Adult congenital heart disease in pregnancy (n=29,262). Vaginal delivery vs. Caesarean section was evaluated on Maternal and neonatal mortality and complications. Vaginal delivery is safe for pregnant women with adult congenital heart disease, whereas higher caesarean section rates are associated with an increased overall risk of adverse maternal outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: