Key result
Parechovirus A1 infected both Paneth cells and enterocytes with robust replication, whereas Parechovirus A3 mainly infected goblet cells and exhibited slower replication kinetics.
Why the study?
PeV-A entry is speculated to occur via respiratory and gastrointestinal routes, but differences in intestinal epithelium replication and tropism between PeV-A1 and PeV-A3 were not characterized.
Differences in cell tropism between PeV-A1 and PeV-A3 in the intestinal epithelium may explain their distinct replication kinetics and associated clinical diseases.
Human parechovirus (PeV-A), one of the species within the Picornaviridae family, is known to cause disease in humans. The most commonly detected genotypes are PeV-A1, associated with mild gastrointestinal disease in young children, and PeV-A3, linked to severe disease with neurological symptoms in neonates. As PeV-A are detectable in stool and nasopharyngeal samples, entry is speculated to occur via the respiratory and gastro-intestinal routes. In this study, we characterized PeV-A1 and PeV-A3 replication and tropism in the intestinal epithelium using a primary 2D model based on human fetal enteroids. This model was permissive to infection with lab-adapted strains and clinical isolates of PeV-A1, but for PeV-A3, infection could only be established with clinical isolates. Replication was highest with infection established from the basolateral side with apical shedding for both genotypes. Compared to PeV-A1, replication kinetics of PeV-A3 were slower. Interestingly, there was a difference in cell tropism with PeV-A1 infecting both Paneth cells and enterocytes, while PeV-A3 infected mainly goblet cells. This difference in cell tropism may explain the difference in replication kinetics and associated disease in humans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
García-Rodríguez et al. (2021) studied Parechovirus A infection. Parechovirus A1 and A3 vs. PeV-A1 vs PeV-A3 was evaluated on Viral replication kinetics and cell tropism. Parechovirus A1 infected both Paneth cells and enterocytes with robust replication, whereas Parechovirus A3 mainly infected goblet cells and exhibited slower replication kinetics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: