Comparative clinical study demonstrates similar bone stability between narrow and standard diameter implants in molar sites, indicating narrow implants withstand high chewing loads.
Purpose: The present investigation assessed the success of narrow diameter implants (NDI) supporting a single crown in the molar region of the jaw. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 patients (>20 years) requiring implant supported crown in the molar region were recruited. A total of 20 patients received NDI (3.5 millimeter (mm), and another 20 received standard diameter implants (SDI), ≥3.75 mm. Crestal bone level, probing depth (PD), implant mobility, and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Results: The control group showed 0.29 ± 0.17 of mean crestal bone loss at 6 months and 0.51 ± 0.21 at 12 months ( P < 0.001). In the test group, mean crestal bone loss of 0.18 ± 0.15 at 6 months ( P = 0.001) and 0.48 ± 0.27 ( P < 0.001) at 12 months was observed. Intergroup comparison at 12 months was nonsignificant ( P = 0.13). An increase of 0.24 ± 0.24 PD at 6 months and of 0.44 ± 0.32 at 12 months was seen in the control group ( P = 0.001). The test group revealed an increase of 0.42 ± 0.26 and 0.63 ± 0.42 PD from baseline to 6 and 12 months, respectively ( P < 0.001). Comparison between groups did not show a significant difference at the study end ( P = 0.06). Regarding BOP, a difference of 0.03 ± 0.76 ( P = 0.15) at 6 months and of 0.13 ± 0.20 ( P = 0.01) at 12 months from baseline was observed in the control group. In the test group, the difference of 0.01 at 6 months ( P = 0.31) and 0.20 at 12 months ( P = 0.006) from baseline was seen. Intergroup comparisons were nonsignificant at the end of the research ( P = 0.44). Conclusions: NDI supporting single crown functioned similarly and successfully to SDI when subjected to high masticatory loads.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gupta et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: