Key result
Continuous blood gas monitoring with the CDI 500 during cardiopulmonary bypass significantly improved pCO2 management compared to standard intermittent monitoring (2% vs 20%; p=0.008).
Why the study?
Does continuous blood gas monitoring improve blood gas management in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass?
Population
100 patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)
Comparison
Continuous blood gas monitoring with the CDI™500… vs Standard CPB blood gas management with…
Design
RCT, Randomized into two groups, Perfusionist blinded to continuous…
Follow-up
During cardiopulmonary bypass
Authors
Loading...
Supports continuous monitoring adoption during CPB; confirms superiority to intermittent sampling for pCO2 control in this RCT.
RCT (n=100)
Single-blind
randomized
Does continuous blood gas monitoring improve blood gas management in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass?
Absolute Event Rate: 2% vs 20%
p-value: p=0.008
Continuous blood gas monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass significantly improves adherence to institutional blood gas management protocols compared to intermittent monitoring.
Ottens et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in Cardiopulmonary bypass (n=100). Continuous blood gas monitoring (CDI 500) vs. Standard CPB blood gas management (intermittent) was evaluated on pCO2 management (p=0.008). Continuous blood gas monitoring with the CDI 500 during cardiopulmonary bypass significantly improved pCO2 management compared to standard intermittent monitoring (2% vs 20%; p=0.008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: