Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tetrahydroanthracene, tetrahydrophenanthrene, and tetrahydrophenalene moieties were used to design novel constrained melatoninergic agents. Compounds 1 and 2 were synthesized from the cyclization of the aryl succinic acids 6a,b followed by catalytic reduction, Curtius degradation to the amino derivatives, and acetylation. The phenalene derivatives 3 were prepared by cyclization of the aza lactones of the corresponding alpha-N-acetyl amino acids. The ketone derivatives were reduced directly by catalytic hydrogenation to produce the compounds 3. The different compounds were evaluated in vitro in binding assays using 2-[125I] iodomelatonin and chicken brain membranes. Melatonin and 2-acetamido-8-methoxytetralin were used as the reference compounds. The results showed the superiority of the dihydrophenalene framework 3 over those of tetrahydroanthracene and tetrahydrophenanthrene. 3a had relatively good affinity for melatonin receptors (Ki = 28.7 nM). Introduction of an additional methoxy group gave a derivative (3c) with nanomolar affinity (Ki = 0.7 nM), confirming the existence of a secondary binding site in the receptor which has been described previously. An increase in the affinity was also observed with the propionamido derivative 3e (Ki = 6.0 nM). The potential agonist properties of the compound 3e were evaluated on the dermal melanocytes of Xenopus laevis tadpoles. At the concentration of 2.3 nM (5 x Ki), melatonin gave a melanophore index value of 1. Similarly to melatonin, 3e was shown to be a potent agonist of the melanosome aggregation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathé‐Allainmat et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: