Key result
Rubella virus RNA was detected in synovial fluid cells of only 2 of 79 patients, failing to confirm an association with chronic inflammatory joint disease.
Why the study?
Is rubella virus associated with chronic inflammatory joint disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=79)
Is rubella virus associated with chronic inflammatory joint disease?
The study fails to confirm an association between rubella virus and chronic inflammatory joint disease, though it suggests the virus may persist in joints and reactivate during immunosuppression.
Does not support rubella testing in chronic joint disease; leaves open rare persistence in immunocompromised patients.
Synovial fluid samples and/or biopsies from 79 patients with various chronic inflammatory joint diseases or traumatic joint injury were tested for rubella virus (RV) in order to confirm or refute results from other studies that suggested RV as a cause of chronic inflammatory joint disease. Sixty-eight of the 72 patients tested had RV antibodies. RV RNA was detected by reverse transcription-PCR in the synovial fluid cells from two patients. RV was also isolated by cell culture from the synovial fluid of one of these two patients. This patient was a 42-year-old female with common variable immune deficiency and Mycoplasma hominis arthritis, while the other was a 68-year-old female with rheumatoid arthritis. While these results fail to confirm that RV is associated with chronic inflammatory joint disease, they suggest that RV may persist within a joint and be reactivated when cell-mediated immunity is suppressed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bosma et al. (1998) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic inflammatory joint diseases or traumatic joint injury (n=79). Rubella virus (RV) infection was evaluated on Detection of RV RNA by reverse transcription-PCR in synovial fluid cells. Rubella virus RNA was detected in synovial fluid cells of only 2 of 79 patients, failing to confirm an association with chronic inflammatory joint disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: