PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 20, 2007American Journal of Clinical Pathology97 citations

Comparison of Lactate Values Between Point-of-Care and Central Laboratory Analyzers

View Full Paper
BKBrad S. KaronRSRenee ScottMBMary F. Burritt

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Measurement of lactate levels is important in the care of critically ill adult and pediatric patients. We compared 3 whole blood lactate methods (Radiometer ABL 725, Radiometer Medical A/S, Bronshoj, Denmark; i-STAT, i-STAT, East Windsor, NJ; and Nova Lactate Plus, Nova Biomedical, Waltham, MA) with 2 plasma-based methods (Roche Integra, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN; and Vitros, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Rochester, NY). The Vitros LAC slide assay was used as the reference method. Results were compared by least squares regression and Bland-Altmann plots and by comparing concordance within clinically relevant lactate ranges. Correlation between lactate methods was good with slopes between 0.87 and 1.06 and intercepts of 0.9 to 1.8 mg/dL (0.1-0.2 mmol/L) of lactate for all 4 methods compared with the Vitros. At high (>54.1 mg/dL 6 mmol/L) lactate values, the Radiometer and i-STAT methods reported lower lactate results compared with the Vitros and Integra. The Nova analyzer reported higher lactate results than either the Vitros or Integra. The negative bias in i-STAT and Radiometer results may confound the interpretation of patient condition if multiple methods are used within the same institution.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Karon et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a94e6c5b7c083589ab2c122https://doi.org/10.1309/hbqefdph34mkk5gp
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper