Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinical trial reveals a lung recruitment manoeuvre restores baseline end-expiratory lung volume in anaesthetised children using a supraglottic airway, indicating an effective countermeasure to...
Background Lung atelectasis is a well-recognised consequence of general anaesthesia in children and can cause poor oxygenation. Lung recruitment manoeuvre has been proposed as a strategy to counteract atelectasis. In this feasibility study, we evaluated whether a recruitment manoeuvre in children with a supraglottic airway restores end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) to baseline using electrical impedance tomography. Methods After ethics committee approval (BASEC 2022-01833), we included children (ASA physical status 1–2, 10–20 kg) scheduled for anaesthesia with a supraglottic airway. We performed a recruitment manoeuvre by setting an anaesthesia machine to spontaneous breathing with a 3 L min −1 fresh gas flow (fraction of inspired oxygen [Fio 2 ] 1.0) and the adjustable pressure-limiting (APL) valve set to 30 cmH 2 O, until a pressure plateau was reached or a leak occurred. Data were collected at three time points: after induction of anaesthesia (baseline), after placement of a supraglottic airway, and after recruitment manoeuvre. The primary endpoint was the normalised change in end-expiratory lung impedance after the recruitment manoeuvre. The global inhomogeneity index was a secondary outcome. Equivalence was assumed if the 95% confidence interval for estimated ΔEELV remained within ±35% (±2 ml kg −1 ). Results Of the 95 eligible children, we analysed 74 datasets. The median (95% confidence interval) estimated difference in EELV after recruitment manoeuvre vs baseline was −0.9 ml kg −1 (−1.6 to −0.1), within the equivalence margin. No significant changes in global inhomogeneity index (0.0 [0.03–0.04]) were observed. Conclusions In children undergoing general anaesthesia with the use of a supraglottic airway, a recruitment manoeuvre effectively restores EELV to baseline. Clinical trial registration NCT05672329
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lippuner et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: