Key result
Root diameter >45 mm without root replacement at index repair was significantly associated with proximal aortic reintervention (SHR 6.9; 95% CI 1.8-27; P=0.005) over a median 10.3 years.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to outline the patterns, prevalence, and outcomes of aortic reinterventions after surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) and to identify factors associated with proximal and distal aortic reinterventions.
Cohort (n=225)
No
Hazard Ratio: 6.9 (95% CI 1.8–27)
p-value: p=0.005
Long-term event-free survival after acute type A aortic dissection repair is impaired, but replacing a moderately dilated aortic root and completely resecting the primary tear during the index surgery may reduce the need for future reinterventions.
May guide post-ATAAD surveillance; hypothesis-generating for prevention strategies pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to outline patterns, prevalence, and outcomes of aortic reinterventions after surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) and to identify factors associated with proximal and distal aortic reinterventions. METHODS: All patients (n = 225) undergoing surgical ATAAD repair at a single center at least 10 years ago (2005-2013) were included. All aortic reinterventions were reported. A Fine-Gray multivariable model, treating death and contraindication as competing risks, was used to investigate factors associated with aortic reintervention. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 10.3 years (interquartile range, 5.0-13.4 years). Thirty-seven patients underwent ≥1 aortic reintervention at median 7.9 years (up to 15 years) after the index procedure. Factors associated with proximal aortic reintervention were root diameter >45 mm without root replacement at index repair (subhazard ratio [SHR], 6.9l; 95% CI, 1.8-27; P = .005), bicuspid aortic valve (SHR, 8.4; 95% CI, 1.5-47; P = .016), and age (SHR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.98; P = .006). Factors associated with distal aortic reinterventions were failure to completely resect the primary tear (SHR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.2-6.0; P = .014) and connective tissue disease (SHR, 24; 95% CI, 8.1-72; P < .001). There were no periprocedural deaths at reintervention. Event-free survival at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years was 82% (95% CI, 77%-87%), 72% (95% CI, 65%-77%), 48% (95% CI, 41%-54%), and 33% (95% CI, 26%-40%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: With sufficient follow-up, event-free survival after ATAAD repair appears substantially impaired. However, in selected patients, aortic reinterventions were performed with favorable outcomes. Replacing a moderately dilated aortic root and ensuring complete resection of the primary tear may decrease the need for future aortic reinterventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bjurbom et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) (n=225). Root diameter >45 mm without root replacement at index repair vs. Root diameter ≤45 mm or root replacement was evaluated on Proximal aortic reintervention (SHR 6.9, 95% CI 1.8-27, p=0.005). Root diameter >45 mm without root replacement at index repair was significantly associated with proximal aortic reintervention (SHR 6.9; 95% CI 1.8-27; P=0.005) over a median 10.3 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: