Key result
A lifestyle risk score aggregating multiple exposures identified 12 blood pressure loci (1 genome-wide significant, p < 5 × 10^-8), 9 of which were novel and missed by single lifestyle approaches.
Why the study?
Multiple lifestyle exposures simultaneously affect blood pressure, but most prior analyses have considered only a single lifestyle exposure at a time.
Does simultaneous consideration of multiple lifestyle exposures in gene-environment interaction analysis identify additional blood pressure loci compared to single lifestyle approaches?
Observational (n=6,254)
Does simultaneous consideration of multiple lifestyle exposures in gene-environment interaction analysis identify additional blood pressure loci compared to single lifestyle approaches?
Aggregating multiple lifestyle exposures into a risk score for gene-environment interaction analysis can identify novel blood pressure loci missed by single-exposure approaches.
Although multiple lifestyle exposures simultaneously impact blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular health, most analysis so far has considered each single lifestyle exposure (e.g., smoking) at a time. Here, we exploit gene–multiple lifestyle exposure interactions to find novel BP loci. For each of 6,254 Framingham Heart Study participants, we computed lifestyle risk score (LRS) value by aggregating the risk of four lifestyle exposures (smoking, alcohol, education, and physical activity) on BP. Using the LRS, we performed genome‐wide gene–environment interaction analysis in systolic and diastolic BP using the joint 2 degree of freedom (DF) and 1 DF interaction tests. We identified one genome‐wide significant ( p < 5 × 10 −8 ) and 11 suggestive ( p < 1 × 10 −6 ) loci. Gene–environment analysis using single lifestyle exposures identified only one of the 12 loci. Nine of the 12 BP loci detected were novel. Loci detected by the LRS were located within or nearby genes with biologically plausible roles in the pathophysiology of hypertension, including KALRN, VIPR2, SNX1 , and DAPK2 . Our results suggest that simultaneous consideration of multiple lifestyle exposures in gene–environment interaction analysis can identify additional loci missed by single lifestyle approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osazuwa‐Peters et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Blood pressure (n=6,254). Lifestyle risk score (LRS) aggregating smoking, alcohol, education, and physical activity vs. Single lifestyle exposures was evaluated on Genome-wide gene-environment interaction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p=< 5 × 10^-8). A lifestyle risk score aggregating multiple exposures identified 12 blood pressure loci (1 genome-wide significant, p < 5 × 10^-8), 9 of which were novel and missed by single lifestyle approaches.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: