Key result
The newly developed Kor-HFpEF equation accurately estimated VO2max in patients with HFpEF with minimal bias (0.353 mL/kg/min) compared to direct measurement, outperforming traditional equations.
Why the study?
It is unclear whether conventional equations for estimating cardiorespiratory fitness are applicable to patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
Does the Kor-HFpEF equation improve the accuracy of estimating VO2max compared to traditional equations in patients with HFpEF?
Cross-Sectional (n=521)
Randomly assigned to development or validation groups
No
Does the Kor-HFpEF equation improve the accuracy of estimating VO2max compared to traditional equations in patients with HFpEF?
Mean Difference: 0.353 (95% CI -6.97–7.68)
Absolute Event Rate: 21.3% vs 21.7%
p-value: p=0.124
The newly developed Kor-HFpEF equation accurately estimates VO2max in patients with HFpEF, overcoming the significant inaccuracies of traditional equations in this specific population.
Conventional equations inaccurately estimate CRF in HFpEF; leaves open validation of new Kor-HFpEF equation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), as measured by maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max), is an important independent predictive factor of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). However, it is unclear whether conventional equations for estimating CRF are applicable to patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: This study included 521 patients with HFpEF (EF ≥ 50%) whose CRF was directly measured by cardiopulmonary exercise test using a treadmill. We developed a new equation (Kor-HFpEF) for half of the patients in the HFpEF cohort (group A, n = 253) and validated it for the remaining half (group B, n = 268). The accuracy of the Kor-HFpEF equation was compared to that of the other equations in the validation group. RESULTS: In the total HFpEF cohort, the directly measured VO2max was significantly overestimated by the FRIEND and ACSM equations (p < 0.001) and underestimated by the FRIEND-HF equation (p <0.001) (direct 21.2 ± 5.9 mL/kg/min; FRIEND 29.1 ± 11.8 mL/kg/min; ACSM 32.5 ± 13.4 mL/kg/min; FRIEND-HF 14.1 ± 4.9 mL/kg/min). However, the VO2max estimated by the Kor-HFpEF equation (21.3 ± 4.6 mL/kg/min) was similar to the directly measured VO2max (21.7 ± 5.9 mL/kg/min, p = 0.124), whereas the VO2max estimated by the other three equations was still significantly different from the directly measured VO2max in group B (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Traditional equations used to estimate VO2max were not applicable to patients with HFpEF. We developed and validated a new Kor-HFpEF equation for these patients, which had a high accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Battumur et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=521). Kor-HFpEF equation vs. Directly measured VO2max was evaluated on Estimated VO2max compared to directly measured VO2max in the validation cohort (Mean bias 0.353 mL/kg/min, 95% CI -6.97 to 7.68, p=0.124). The newly developed Kor-HFpEF equation accurately estimated VO2max in patients with HFpEF with minimal bias (0.353 mL/kg/min) compared to direct measurement, outperforming traditional equations.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: