Key result
Administration of N-acetylcysteine, pentoxifylline, or both protected lung tissue from skeletal muscle ischemia/reperfusion by preserving oxidative stress markers and lung injury scores (p<0.05).
Why the study?
Does N-acetylcysteine and/or pentoxifylline prevent remote lung injury in a rat model of hind-limb ischemia/reperfusion?
Does N-acetylcysteine and/or pentoxifylline prevent remote lung injury in a rat model of hind-limb ischemia/reperfusion?
In a rat model of hind-limb ischemia/reperfusion, both N-acetylcysteine and pentoxifylline protected against remote lung injury, but their combination provided no additive benefit.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not alter clinical I/R management; leaves open translation of NAC or pentoxifylline to human remote lung protection.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and pentoxifylline in a model of remote organ injury after hind-limb ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) in rats, the lungs being the remote organ system. METHODS: Thirty-five male Wistar rats were assigned to one of five conditions (n = 7/group), as follows: sham operation (control group); hind-limb ischemia, induced by clamping the left femoral artery, for 2 h, followed by 24 h of reperfusion (I/R group); and hind-limb ischemia, as above, followed by intraperitoneal injection (prior to reperfusion) of 150 mg/kg of NAC (I/R+NAC group), 40 mg/kg of pentoxifylline (I/R+PTX group), or both (I/R+NAC+PTX group). At the end of the trial, lung tissues were removed for histological analysis and assessment of oxidative stress. RESULTS: In comparison with the rats in the other groups, those in the I/R group showed lower superoxide dismutase activity and glutathione levels, together with higher malondialdehyde levels and lung injury scores (p < 0.05 for all). Interstitial inflammatory cell infiltration of the lungs was also markedly greater in the I/R group than in the other groups. In addition, I/R group rats showed various signs of interstitial edema and hemorrhage. In the I/R+NAC, I/R+PTX, and I/R+NAC+PTX groups, superoxide dismutase activity, glutathione levels, malondialdehyde levels, and lung injury scores were preserved (p < 0.05 for all). The differences between the administration of NAC or pentoxifylline alone and the administration of the two together were not significant for any of those parameters (p > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that NAC and pentoxifylline both protect lung tissue from the effects of skeletal muscle I/R. However, their combined use does not appear to increase the level of that protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takhtfooladi et al. (2016) studied remote lung injury after hind-limb ischemia/reperfusion (n=35). N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and pentoxifylline vs. sham operation and untreated I/R was evaluated on superoxide dismutase activity, glutathione levels, malondialdehyde levels, and lung injury scores (p=<0.05). Administration of N-acetylcysteine, pentoxifylline, or both protected lung tissue from skeletal muscle ischemia/reperfusion by preserving oxidative stress markers and lung injury scores (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: