Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Improved communication and education for healthcare professionals are necessary to facilitate timely ICD deactivation and prevent distressful shocks at the end of life.
The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is effective in terminating life-threatening arrhythmias. However, in the last phase of life, ICD shocks may no longer be appropriate. Guidelines recommend timely discussion with the patient regarding deactivation of the shock function of the ICD. However, research shows that such conversations are scarce, and some patients experience avoidable and distressful shocks in the final days of life. Barriers such as physicians' lack of time, difficulties in finding the right time to discuss ICD deactivation, patients' reluctance to discuss the topic, and the fragmentation of care, which obscures responsibilities, prevent healthcare professionals from discussing this topic with the patient. In this point-of-view article, we argue that healthcare professionals who are involved in the care for ICD patients should be better educated on how to communicate with patients about ICD deactivation and the end of life. Optimal communication is needed to reduce the number of patients experiencing inappropriate and painful shocks in the terminal stage of their lives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stoevelaar et al. (2020) studied Care for ICD patients at the end of life (n=26). Discussing ICD deactivation was evaluated on Perceived barriers to discussing ICD deactivation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: