Key result
Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy had significantly reduced left atrial active emptying fraction (29% vs 41%) and increased left atrial volume compared to normal controls.
Why the study?
Do left atrial geometry and contractile function differ between patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, and normal controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=60)
No
Do left atrial geometry and contractile function differ between patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, and normal controls?
Left atrial enlargement and contractile dysfunction in ischemic cardiomyopathy are similar to those seen in dilated cardiomyopathy, suggesting these parameters cannot reliably differentiate between the two conditions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LA dysfunction in ischemic cardiomyopathy resembles dilated cardiomyopathy; leaves open differentiation utility and requires prospective validation.
Background Many of the factors that are known to alter left atrial (LA) contractility are present in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Nevertheless, preservation of LA contractile function in this group of patients was reported in previous studies. The aim of this study was to assess the changes in LA size, geometry and contractile function in ICM. Methods and results 60 subjects (age: 49 ± 12 years, 53% males) in sinus rhythm undergoing coronary angiography (CA), were enrolled in this study; 15 subjects as a control group, 30 patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) and significant coronary artery disease; as the ICM group, and 15 with reduced EF and normal CA; as the dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) group. LA dimensions, volume, active emptying fraction (ACTEF) and eccentricity index (LAEi) as well as late diastolic velocities of the mitral annulus (a′) and LA free wall (A 3 ) were measured. Compared with the control group, ICM patients had larger LA volume and reduced ACTEF, a′ and A 3 , with no significant difference between patients with ICM and DCM in any of these parameters. LA eccentricity was, non-significantly, higher in both cardiomyopathy groups than in the control group. Conclusions Patients with ICM have increased LA volume and reduced LA contractile function in comparison with normal controls. LA enlargement, LA contractile dysfunction and LA geometric changes in ICM are similar to that occurring in DCM. LA size, contractile function and eccentricity may not be reliable in differentiating ischemic from idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wael Mohammad Atteia (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Ischemic cardiomyopathy (n=60). Ischemic cardiomyopathy vs. Normal controls was evaluated on Left atrial active emptying fraction (ACTEF) (p=0.0046). Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy had significantly reduced left atrial active emptying fraction (29% vs 41%) and increased left atrial volume compared to normal controls.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: