Key result
Analysis of the complete viral genome of a canine rotavirus C strain from a dog with enteritis revealed distinctive genetic features, with VP7, VP4, and VP6 classified as G10, P8, and I8.
Case Report (n=1)
The study provides the first complete viral genome analysis of a canine rotavirus C strain, revealing marked genetic diversity and evolutionary links to bovine and porcine strains.
First canine RVC genome reveals bovine-porcine reassortment; leaves open surveillance needs for cross-species strains.
Species C rotaviruses (RVC) have been identified in humans and animals, including pigs, cows and ferrets. In dogs, RVC strains have been reported anecdotally on the basis of visualization of rotavirus-like virions by electron microscopy combined with specific electrophoretic migration patterns of the genomic RNA segments. However, no further molecular characterization of these viruses was performed. Here, we report the detection of a canine RVC in the stool of a dog with enteritis. Analysis of the complete viral genome uncovered distinctive genetic features of the identified RVC strain. The genes encoding VP7, VP4 and VP6 were distantly related to those of other RVC strains and were putatively classified as G10, P8 and I8, respectively. The new strain was named RVC/Dog-wt/HUN/KE174/2012/G10P[8]. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that canine RVC was most closely related to bovine RVC strains with the exception of the NSP4 gene, which clustered together with porcine RVC strains. These findings provide further evidence for the genetic diversity of RVC strains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marton et al. (2015) conducted a case report in Enteritis (n=1). Canine rotavirus C strain detection and characterization was evaluated on Viral genome characterization. Analysis of the complete viral genome of a canine rotavirus C strain from a dog with enteritis revealed distinctive genetic features, with VP7, VP4, and VP6 classified as G10, P8, and I8.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: