Key result
Corneal nerve density was significantly lower in Type 1 diabetes patients with cardiac autonomic neuropathy compared to those without (32.8 vs 51.7 fibres/mm2, P=0.008).
Why the study?
Does corneal confocal microscopy detect small nerve fibre degeneration associated with cardiac autonomic neuropathy in people with Type 1 diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=56)
Single-blind
No
Does corneal confocal microscopy detect small nerve fibre degeneration associated with cardiac autonomic neuropathy in people with Type 1 diabetes?
Absolute Event Rate: 32.8% vs 51.7%
p-value: p=0.008
Corneal confocal microscopy may serve as a novel, non-invasive tool to identify cardiac autonomic neuropathy in patients with Type 1 diabetes.
Lower corneal nerve density was associated with cardiac autonomic neuropathy in Type 1 diabetes; hypothesis-generating for corneal confocal microscopy and requires prospective validation.
AIMS: To investigate whether small nerve fibre degeneration detected using corneal confocal microscopy is associated with cardiac autonomic neuropathy in people with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: Thirty-six people with Type 1 diabetes and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects were enrolled. Tests to determine heart rate response to deep-breathing (expiratory-to-inspiratory ratio), heart rate response to lying-to-stand test (30:15 ratio) and blood pressure response to standing were performed to detect cardiac autonomic neuropathy. Corneal confocal microscopy was performed to assess: corneal nerve density and corneal nerve beadings; branching pattern; and nerve fibre tortuosity. RESULTS: Compared with control participants, participants with Type 1 diabetes had fewer (mean ± SD 45.4 ± 20.2 vs 92.0 ± 22.7 fibres/mm²; P < 0.001) and more tortuous corneal nerve fibres (20 participants with Type 1 diabetes vs four control participants had nerve tortuosity grade 2/3; P = 0.022) and fewer beadings (mean ± SD 15.1 ± 3.5 vs 20.6 ± 5.0; P < 0.001). Of the participants with Type 1 diabetes, 11 met the criteria for the diagnosis of cardiac autonomic neuropathy. Corneal nerve density was significantly lower in participants with cardiac autonomic neuropathy than in those without (mean ± SD 32.8 ± 16.4 vs 51.7 ± 18.9 fibres/mm²; P = 0.008). This difference remained significant after adjustment for age (P = 0.02), gender (P = 0.04), disease duration (P = 0.005), insulin requirement (P = 0.02) and neuropathy disability score (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that corneal confocal microscopy could represent a new and non-invasive tool to investigate cardiac autonomic neuropathy in people with Type 1 diabetes. Larger studies are required to define the role of corneal confocal microscopy in the assessment of cardiac autonomic neuropathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maddaloni et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 1 diabetes and cardiac autonomic neuropathy (n=56). Cardiac autonomic neuropathy vs. No cardiac autonomic neuropathy was evaluated on Corneal nerve density (fibres/mm2) (p=0.008). Corneal nerve density was significantly lower in Type 1 diabetes patients with cardiac autonomic neuropathy compared to those without (32.8 vs 51.7 fibres/mm2, P=0.008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: