Why the study?
Does natural rotavirus infection increase homotypic and heterotypic antirotavirus antibodies in children in day care centers?
Does natural rotavirus infection increase homotypic and heterotypic antirotavirus antibodies in children in day care centers?
Natural rotavirus infections in children lead to the development of both homotypic and heterotypic antibodies, correlating with broad protection against rotavirus illness.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Natural rotavirus infection may boost protective antibodies in day care children; leaves open optimal strategies for inducing heterotypic immunity via vaccination.
The acquisition of serum antirotavirus antibodies among children in day care centers was monitored through two rotavirus seasons. Twenty-six children were monitored daily for diarrhea and weekly for stool rotavirus excretion through a rotavirus season of infections with serotype G1 and a successive season of infections with both G1 and G3. Sera were collected before and after each rotavirus season and tested for antirotavirus IgA and IgG and for G type-specific blocking antibody. The prevalence of protective serum IgA and IgG titers increased from 36% and 45% before Season 1 to 77% and 96% after Season 2, respectively (P < 0.02 and 0.001). G type-specific antibodies also increased (G1, P < 0.001; G2, P = 0.005; G3, P = 0.003; G4, P = 0.006), including for noncirculating types. Homotypic and heterotypic antibodies increased as the number of rotavirus infections experienced by a child increased. The group of children with two proven infections developed protective isotype-specific and G type-specific antibodies. These results indicate that in first exposures to rotavirus G types, children develop predominantly homotypic antibody. However, as the number of rotavirus infections increase, children develop heterotypic antibody to G types at levels that correlate with broad protection against rotavirus infection and illness, despite exposure to a restricted number of G types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Ryan et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: