Why the study?
Does finger photoplethysmographic blood pressure measurement accurately reflect intra-arterial blood pressure during resistance exercise in hypertensive subjects?
Does finger photoplethysmographic blood pressure measurement accurately reflect intra-arterial blood pressure during resistance exercise in hypertensive subjects?
Finger photoplethysmography provides accurate estimates of systolic blood pressure increments during resistance exercise but slightly overestimates maximal systolic and underestimates maximal diastolic pressures compared to the intra-arterial gold standard.
FPP may suffice for tracking systolic BP rises in hypertensive exercise studies; leaves open replacement of intra-arterial monitoring for maximal pressures.
Blood pressure (BP) assessment during resistance exercise can be useful to avoid high BP, reducing cardiovascular risk, especially in hypertensive individuals. However, non-invasive accurate technique for this purpose is not available. The aim of this study was to compare finger photoplethysmographic (FPP) and intra-arterial BP values and responses during resistance exercise. Eight non-medicated hypertensive subjects (5 males, 30-60 years) were evaluated during pre-exercise resting period and during three sets of the knee extension exercise performed at 80% of 1RM until fatigue. BP was measured simultaneously by FPP and intra-arterial methods. Data are mean+/-SD. Systolic BP was significantly higher with FPP than with intra-arterial: at pre-exercise (157+/-13 vs. 152+/-10 mmHg; p<0.01) and the mean (202+/-29 vs. 198+/-26 mmHg; p<0.01), and the maximal (240+/-26 vs. 234+/-16 mmHg; p<0.05) values achieved during exercise. The increase in systolic BP during resistance exercise was similar between FPP and intra-arterial (+73+/-29 vs. +71+/-18 mmHg; p=0.59). Diastolic BP values and increases were lower with FPP. In conclusion, FPP provides similar values of BP increment during resistance exercise than intra-arterial method. However, it overestimates by 2.6+/-6.1% the maximal systolic BP achieved during this mode of exercise and underestimates by 8.8+/-5.8% the maximal diastolic BP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gomides et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: