Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 21, 2020Circulation

General Versus Local Anesthesia With Conscious Sedation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Local anesthesia with conscious sedation is commonly used in transcatheter aortic valve replacement, but randomized data comparing its safety and efficacy with general anesthesia were lacking.

Does local anesthesia with conscious sedation result in equivalent outcomes compared to general anesthesia in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement?

Population

447 patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Comparison

Conscious sedation vs general anesthesia

Design

Multicenter open-label 2x2 factorial randomized equivalence trial

Follow-up

30 days

Authors

Hölger ThieleHölger ThieleInterventional / Structural CardiologyTKThomas KurzHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinHFHans‐Josef FeistritzerDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Conscious sedation is equivalent to general anesthesia for the primary composite in transfemoral TAVR; confirms equivalence and supports preference to reduce inotrope/vasopressor needs.

Structured PICO

Does local anesthesia with conscious sedation result in equivalent outcomes compared to general anesthesia in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement?

P
Population
447 patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement
I
Intervention
Local anesthesia with conscious sedation (CS)
C
Comparator
General anesthesia (GA)
O
Outcome
Composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, infection requiring antibiotic treatment, and acute kidney injury at 30 dayscomposite

In patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR, conscious sedation is equivalent to general anesthesia regarding a 30-day composite of mortality, stroke, MI, infection, and AKI, and is associated with a lower need for inotropes or vasopressors.

Cite This Study

Thiele et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a95227fa9fda6dc960f410ahttps://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.120.046451

Topics

Transcatheter aortic valve replacementTAVR in low-risk patients
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Who Cannot Undergo Surgery2010 · 7,247 citations
  2. 2S3 guidelines for intensive care in cardiac surgery patients: hemodynamic monitoring and cardiocirculary system2010 · 102 citations
  3. 3General anaesthesia vs. conscious sedation for transfemoral aortic valve implantation: a single UK centre before‐and‐after study2016 · 48 citations
  4. 4Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients2019 · 3,708 citations
  5. 5Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis2014 · 2,921 citations