Why the study?
Does the erythrocyte aggregability index differ between patients with acute ischemic brain infarcts and healthy controls?
Does the erythrocyte aggregability index differ between patients with acute ischemic brain infarcts and healthy controls?
Erythrocyte aggregability is significantly elevated in acute ischemic stroke and may serve as a sensitive marker for disease prognosis and microvascular hemorheological disorders.
Elevated erythrocyte aggregability may mark acute ischemic stroke; case-control data leave its prognostic value hypothesis-generating.
Since the role of microvascular rheological disorders has been so far insufficiently analysed in development of stroke, we examined in course of acute stage of ischemic brain infarcts the most essential feature of disorders - erythrocyte aggregability with ‘Georgian technique’ assuring direct and quantitative data. In addition, ultrasonic Doppler scanning of cerebral arteries, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and serial cerebral angiography were repeatedly applied. Index of erythrocyte aggregability was found more than twice higher in acute stage of ischemic brain infarcts than in healthy control group. In a significant number of cases infarcts were produced by microcirculatory stases, related to enhanced erythrocyte aggregation. Aggregability index was found to be more sensitive as compared to blood plasma fibrinogen content and blood hematocrit for prediction of dynamics and outcome of acute phase of disease. In addition, aggregability designated extent of the accompanied brain edema. We arrived at conclusion that erythrocyte aggregability is a notable feature characterizing the microvascular hemorheological disorders. It represents an essential risk-factor furthering both development of microcirculatory stases and ischemic brain infarcts. Necessarily, it is to be tested with most perfect techniques providing reliable diagnosis and prognosis of the disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mchedlishvili et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: