Why the study?
Studies validating the psychometric properties of HADS in older adults are limited, and no prior studies utilized confirmative factor analyses in community-dwelling older adults regardless of health conditions.
The HADS demonstrates acceptable reliability and construct validity in community-dwelling older adults, though specific depression items (like item 6) are problematic and may require modification for this population.
HADS shows acceptable properties after modifications but flags unreliable depression items in adults 70+; leaves open further validation before routine use.
Objectives The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is commonly used to measure anxiety and depression, but the number of studies validating psychometric properties in older adults are limited. To our knowledge, no previous studies have utilized confirmative factor analyses in community-dwelling older adults, regardless of health conditions. Thus, this study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of HADS in older adults 70 + living at home in a large Norwegian city. Methods In total, 1190 inhabitants ≥ 70 (range 70 – 96) years completed the HADS inventory in the population-based Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT), termed “HUNT4 70 + ” in Trondheim, Norway. Confirmatory factor analyses were performed to test the dimensionality, reliability, and construct validity. Results The original two-factor-solution (Model-1) revealed only partly a good fit to the present data; however, including a cross-loading for item 6 D ( “I feel cheerful” ) along with a correlated error term between item 2 D ( “I still enjoy the things I used to enjoy” ) and 12 D ( “I look forward with enjoyment to things ”) improved the fit substantially. Good to acceptable measurement reliability was demonstrated, and the construct validity was acceptable. Conclusions The HADS involves some items that are not reliable and valid indicators for the depression construct in this population, especially item 6 is problematic. To improve the reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of HADS, we recommend that essential aspects of depression in older adults should be included.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sivertsen et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: