Key result
A 9-point HADS cut-off yields moderate diagnostic accuracy for anxiety and depression in motor-impaired patients.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the psychometric characteristics of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in patients with impaired motor functions.
What are the psychometric properties and optimal diagnostic cutoffs of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in patients with impaired motor functions?
Observational (n=100)
No
What are the psychometric properties and optimal diagnostic cutoffs of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in patients with impaired motor functions?
A modified cutoff of 9 points on the HADS subscales improves diagnostic accuracy for anxiety and depression in patients undergoing rehabilitation for motor function disorders.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports modified HADS cutoffs for screening in motor-impaired patients; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The aim of the study is to investigate the psychometric characteristics of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) on a sample of patients with impaired motor functions. HADS was used to examine the current psychoemotional state of 73 women and 27 men aged 62.1±13.7 years who were in the hospital for inpatient rehabilitation for motor function disorders arising from a stroke (n=50) or developing against the background of chronic musculoskeletal disorders (n=50). Independent of the psychologist, a psychiatrist examined the same patients, filling out Hamilton Anxiety and Depression scales. A comparison of the findings led to the conclusion of overdiagnosis with the HADS subscales. At the same time, it is shown that the questionnaire items have satisfactory indices of discriminativeness and internal reliability. The combination of low content and convergent validity of some items of the questionnaire allowed modifying subscales, reducing the number of items without prejudice to psychometric characteristics. By comparing the data obtained with an objective external criterion for the Anxiety (HADS-A) and Depression (HADS-D) subscales, new cutoffs (9 points) were determined for diagnosing the presence or absence of anxiety and depression, which allows to use this version of the test more effectively for screening the current psychoemotional state in patients with impaired motor functions who enter the second stage of medical rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Кукшина et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Impaired motor functions (stroke or chronic musculoskeletal disorders) (n=100). Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) vs. Hamilton Anxiety and Depression scales (HDRS, HARS) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of HADS for anxiety and depression. In patients with impaired motor functions, a modified HADS cut-off of 9 points yielded a sensitivity of 52.63% and specificity of 91.36% for anxiety, and 58.06% and 72.46% for depression.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: