Why the study?
What are the prescribing patterns and usage rates for thrombolytic drugs in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
What are the prescribing patterns and usage rates for thrombolytic drugs in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
The survey highlights a low and variable use of thrombolytic drugs for acute myocardial infarction, suggesting a need to address patient- and physician-related obstacles to improve treatment rates.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low thrombolytic use in AMI with institutional variation may reflect barriers; leaves open targeted quality improvement studies.
In November 1988, 164 hospitals enrolled in the Drug Surveillance Network participated in a nationwide survey of prescribing patterns for thrombolytic drugs for patients with an acute myocardial infarction. The results indicated that alteplase has made dramatic inroads, being used exclusively in 14.6% of the hospitals; in 64% of the hospitals both alteplase and streptokinase were on the formulary. Overall, however, only 17% of patients admitted with an acute myocardial infarction were treated with a thrombolytic, and use of these agents varied markedly across institutions. One of the reasons for this low figure may be the current maximum allowable time from onset of symptoms to administration of a thrombolytic. This time limit was less than 6 hours in the majority of hospitals in spite of recent evidence suggesting that these drugs may be effective up to 24 hours after onset of symptoms. The low and variable use of the agents for acute myocardial infarction suggests the need to identify patient- and physician-related obstacles so that overall attitudes and professional practice can be modified to reverse this trend. Given large number of institutions reporting the presence of formal, prospective, pharmacy-initiated monitoring programs, we suggest that clinical pharmacists will play a major role in implementing the necessary changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grasela et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: