Why the study?
Does bi-bundle branch pacing improve biventricular synchrony and clinical outcomes in a patient with severe heart failure and wide LBBB?
Population
One 72-year-old man with severe heart failure (LVEF 21%) and wide LBBB (QRS 227 ms)
Comparison
Bi-bundle branch pacing using RV defibrillation lead and separate LBBP lead in CRT-D
Design
Case report
Follow-up
2-month
Key result
Bi-bundle branch pacing in a CRT-D system narrowed QRS from 227 to 137 ms and improved LVEF from 21% to 53% at 2 months in a patient with severe heart failure.
Authors
Loading...
May improve synchrony and LVEF in select LBBB-HF cases; leaves open prospective validation of bi-bundle pacing.
Case Report (n=1)
Does bi-bundle branch pacing improve biventricular synchrony and clinical outcomes in a patient with severe heart failure and wide LBBB?
Bi-bundle branch pacing using an RV defibrillation lead and a separate LBBP lead is a feasible strategy to improve resynchronization in CRT-D patients.
Shen et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Severe heart failure and wide LBBB (n=1). Bi-bundle branch pacing strategy in a CRT-D system was evaluated on QRS duration, NYHA class, and LVEF. Bi-bundle branch pacing in a CRT-D system narrowed QRS from 227 to 137 ms and improved LVEF from 21% to 53% at 2 months in a patient with severe heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: