Stress cardiomyopathy is a rare but clinically significant cause of hemodynamic impairment and cardiogenic shock in critically ill ICU patients, often driven by catecholamine toxicity or neurological stress.
Stress cardiomyopathy warrants consideration in ICU shock; observational data leaves open optimal screening and management strategies.
BACKGROUND: Stress cardiomyopathy (SC) is a transient ventricular dysfunction rarely described in the critical care setting. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the mechanisms, incidence, treatment and prognosis of SC. METHOD: This is a retrospective observational study of every critically-ill patient admitted to the ICU over a period of two years. RESULTS: Among 1314 patients admitted in the ICU, 20 patients (1.5%) were diagnosed with SC. A total of 249 patients experienced cardiogenic shock, whereas 8% were suffering from SC. SC was suspected because of hemodynamic impairment (80% of cases), ECG modifications (15%) and/or dyspnea (15%). SC was apical (typical Tako-tsubo) in 90% and atypical in 10% of cases. Several mechanisms or conditions may explain the occurrence of SC and are may be combined: catecholamine toxicity (45%), psychological stress, seizures or neurological impairment (35%), non-epicardial coronary ischemia (20%) and left ventricular outflow track (LVOT) obstruction (10%). SC could have indirectly caused death by worsening heart failure in three patients and arrhythmias were seen in 40% of patients. SAPS2, renal impairment, malnutrition, norepinephrine infusion and thrombocytopenia were associated with death in the univariate analysis. Catecholamines were required in 85% and intra-aortic balloon pump in 20% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: SC is a rare reversible cardiac impairment in the critically-ill patient that can induce arrhythmias and cardiogenic shock. The likely mechanisms are combined: catecholamine toxicity, stress or neurological involvement and less frequently ischemia or LVOT obstruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Champion et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: